<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental eDeskbook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com</link>
	<description>inform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:37:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LawFlash: Clean Water Act Orders Subject to Pre-Enforcement Review</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/03/lawflash-clean-water-act-orders-subject-to-pre-enforcement-review/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/03/lawflash-clean-water-act-orders-subject-to-pre-enforcement-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Ron Tenpas, Chris McAuliffe, and John McAleese In a much-anticipated decision, Sackett v. EPA, 566 U.S. ______ (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided yesterday that a party may seek judicial review of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency&#8217;s (EPA&#8217;s) jurisdiction to issue an administrative compliance order under the Clean Water Act before EPA enforces [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: xx-small; color: #888888;">by <a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/bios/rtenpas">Ron Tenpas</a>, </span><span style="font-size: xx-small; color: #888888;"><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/bios/cmcauliffe">Chris McAuliffe</a>, and <a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/bios/jmcaleese">John McAleese</a></span></p>
<p>In a much-anticipated decision, <em>Sackett v. EPA</em>, 566 U.S. ______ (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously decided yesterday that a party may seek judicial review of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency&#8217;s (EPA&#8217;s) jurisdiction to issue an administrative compliance order under the Clean Water Act before EPA enforces the order. The decision is significant because parties subject to an enforcement order under the Clean Water Act may now be able to challenge an EPA order without the risk of incurring additional daily penalties and further enforcement. Previously, EPA maintained that its order could only be challenged by waiting for enforcement to occur.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/Enviro_LF_CleanWaterActAdminCompliance_22mar12">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/03/lawflash-clean-water-act-orders-subject-to-pre-enforcement-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJDEP Rule Provides Relief from Environmental Regulatory Requirements</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/03/njdep-rule-provides-relief-from-environmental-regulatory-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/03/njdep-rule-provides-relief-from-environmental-regulatory-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) adopted a new rule on March 8 that provides a process for NJDEP to waive compliance with regulatory requirements. Waivers of compliance are granted at NJDEP&#8217;s discretion, following a demonstration by a party seeking the waiver, and consistent with NJDEP&#8217;s core mission to maintain, protect, and enhance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) adopted a new rule on March 8 that provides a process for NJDEP to waive compliance with regulatory requirements. Waivers of compliance are granted at NJDEP&#8217;s discretion, following a demonstration by a party seeking the waiver, and consistent with NJDEP&#8217;s core mission to maintain, protect, and enhance New Jersey&#8217;s natural resources and to protect public health, safety and welfare, and the environment. NJDEP will begin accepting applications for waivers on August 1, 2012.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/EnvLF_NJDEP-ReliefFromRegulatoryRequirements_13mar12" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/03/njdep-rule-provides-relief-from-environmental-regulatory-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pennsylvania Passes Comprehensive Amendments to Oil and Gas Laws</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/02/pennsylvania-passes-comprehensive-amendments-to-oil-and-gas-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/02/pennsylvania-passes-comprehensive-amendments-to-oil-and-gas-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On February 13, Governor Tom Corbett signed House Bill 1950, amending Title 58 (Oil and Gas) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. This legislation, most of which will become effective on April 13, imposes a drilling &#8220;impact fee&#8221; and preempts local environmental regulation of oil and gas operations. It also strengthens requirements for permitting and expands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 13, Governor Tom Corbett signed House Bill 1950, amending Title 58 (Oil and Gas) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. This legislation, most of which will become effective on April 13, imposes a drilling &#8220;impact fee&#8221; and preempts local environmental regulation of oil and gas operations. It also strengthens requirements for permitting and expands disclosure requirements for fracking chemicals and reporting obligations. Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, is a technique that uses water mixed with chemicals and sand to pump deep into shale layers to extract gas.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/Enviro_LF_PAOilGasComprehensiveAmendments_14feb12" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/02/pennsylvania-passes-comprehensive-amendments-to-oil-and-gas-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fee-Shifting Ruling Encourages Intervention in Clean Air Challenges</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/01/fee-shifting-ruling-encourages-intervention-in-clean-air-challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/01/fee-shifting-ruling-encourages-intervention-in-clean-air-challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On December 20, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit expanded fee-shifting incentives for parties that intervene in challenges to Clean Air Act rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The novel ruling may encourage state and local governments, environmental groups, and many others to intervene in future EPA cases, with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On December 20, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit expanded fee-shifting incentives for parties that intervene in challenges to Clean Air Act rules issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The novel ruling may encourage state and local governments, environmental groups, and many others to intervene in future EPA cases, with the expectation of a &#8220;free ride.&#8221;</p>
<p>Under Section 307(f) of the Clean Air Act, courts may award reasonable attorneys&#8217; fees &#8220;whenever . . . such award is appropriate.&#8221; One need not be a &#8220;prevailing party&#8221; to trigger fee shifting, but prior cases awarded fees only to parties that contributed to the &#8220;proper implementation and administration of the Act&#8221; by playing &#8220;a significant role in the litigation.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/Environmental_LF_InterventioninCleanAirChallenges_12jan12" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2012/01/fee-shifting-ruling-encourages-intervention-in-clean-air-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Withdraws Draft Ozone Ambient Air Quality Standards and Reinstates 2008 Standards</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/09/obama-administration-withdraws-draft-ozone-ambient-air-quality-standards-and-reinstates-2008-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/09/obama-administration-withdraws-draft-ozone-ambient-air-quality-standards-and-reinstates-2008-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama announced on September 2 that his administration was withdrawing the draft ozone ambient air quality standards that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had prepared and was in the process of issuing as new regulations. The new regulations, had they become final, would have resulted in stricter standards related to ozone. This action [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama announced on September 2 that his administration was withdrawing the draft ozone ambient air quality standards that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had prepared and was in the process of issuing as new regulations. The new regulations, had they become final, would have resulted in stricter standards related to ozone. This action does not relieve companies of compliance with any current air pollution control requirements because the withdrawn standards had not been adopted as final. Moreover, the withdrawal may result in only a temporary respite from new ozone standards because the Clean Air Act requires EPA to reconsider ozone standards in 2013. In addition, the administration has clarified that it intends to proceed to the next steps in implementing standards announced in 2008.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/publication.detail/publicationID/05386066-5fa2-4b29-a444-beb74263013c" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/09/obama-administration-withdraws-draft-ozone-ambient-air-quality-standards-and-reinstates-2008-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to the Morgan Lewis Environmental eDeskbook</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/07/welcome/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/07/welcome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 13:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This eDeskbook is designed to be an up-to-date reference tool for people encountering environmental issues and the regulatory framework established to protect the environment. The eDeskbook provides quick access to environmental regulations, noteworthy calendar items, articles, other environmental resource materials, and Morgan Lewis attorney contact information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This eDeskbook is designed to be an up-to-date reference tool for people encountering environmental issues and the regulatory framework established to protect the environment.</p>
<p>The eDeskbook provides quick access to environmental regulations, noteworthy calendar items, articles, other environmental resource materials, and Morgan Lewis attorney contact information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/07/welcome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ARTICLE: Potential Disclosure Regimes in the Hydraulic Fracturing Industry</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/06/potential-disclosure-regimes-in-the-hydraulic-fracturing-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/06/potential-disclosure-regimes-in-the-hydraulic-fracturing-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morgan Lewis partners Ronald Tenpas and Alex Polonsky authored an article in Westlaw Journal: Environmental (Vol. 31, Issue 24). Read the article &#62;&#62;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morgan Lewis partners Ronald Tenpas and Alex Polonsky authored an article in <em>Westlaw Journal: Environmental</em> (Vol. 31, Issue 24). <em> </em><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/WLJ_DisclosureRegimes_22june11.pdf" target="_blank">Read the article</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/06/potential-disclosure-regimes-in-the-hydraulic-fracturing-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Changes the Climate on Greenhouse Gas Suits</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/06/supreme-court-changes-the-climate-on-greenhouse-gas-suits/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/06/supreme-court-changes-the-climate-on-greenhouse-gas-suits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, reviewing whether federal common law would support a claim that greenhouse gas emissions could give rise to a public nuisance claim that would warrant injunctive relief against future emissions. The Court concluded that the federal common law cannot support such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in <em>American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut</em>,  reviewing whether federal common law would support a claim that  greenhouse gas emissions could give rise to a public nuisance claim that  would warrant injunctive relief against future emissions. The Court concluded that the federal common law cannot support such a claim.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/publication.detail/publicationID/34ed7365-56d4-44f6-9bdf-8b25271d061c" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/06/supreme-court-changes-the-climate-on-greenhouse-gas-suits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Proposes Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing Facilities</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/04/epa-proposes-standards-for-cooling-water-intake-structures-at-existing-facilities/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/04/epa-proposes-standards-for-cooling-water-intake-structures-at-existing-facilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 28, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued proposed regulations under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act that set standards applicable to cooling water intake structures for the protection of aquatic organisms. The proposed regulations would require existing large power plants and manufacturing facilities that withdraw water from adjacent water bodies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 28, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  issued proposed regulations under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act  that set standards applicable to cooling water intake structures for the  protection of aquatic organisms. The proposed regulations  would require existing large power plants and manufacturing facilities  that withdraw water from adjacent water bodies exclusively for cooling  to limit the number of aquatic organisms that are killed when they are  pinned against the facility&#8217;s intake structure or that are drawn into  the facility&#8217;s cooling system. The section 316(b) standards would be  implemented through National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System  (NPDES) permits issued to the covered facilities.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/publication.detail/publicationID/e7cae60d-1eea-49eb-ba22-01031b215225" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/04/epa-proposes-standards-for-cooling-water-intake-structures-at-existing-facilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FOLLOW-UP: EPA Postpones Greenhouse Gas Reporting Deadline</title>
		<link>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/03/follow-up-epa-postpones-greenhouse-gas-reporting-deadline/</link>
		<comments>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/03/follow-up-epa-postpones-greenhouse-gas-reporting-deadline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John McAleese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/03/follow-up-epa-postpones-greenhouse-gas-reporting-deadline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that it is postponing the March 31 deadline for submitting the first greenhouse gas emission reports under the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (Mandatory Reporting Rule). As we reported in our February 28, 2011 LawFlash, the Mandatory Reporting Rule required subject operations to submit reports of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced today that it is postponing the March 31 deadline for submitting the first greenhouse gas emission reports under the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule (Mandatory Reporting Rule). As we reported in our February 28, 2011 LawFlash, the Mandatory Reporting Rule required subject operations to submit reports of their greenhouse gas emissions data from calendar year 2010 by March 31, 2011. Today&#8217;s action by EPA adjourns that deadline, but does not set a new deadline for when entities must report their 2010 greenhouse gas emissions data. EPA plans to issue the final tool for uploading data for the reports this summer.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.morganlewis.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/publication.detail/publicationID/cc84e5c2-280b-43eb-8512-6a9a9748968e" target="_blank">Read our LawFlash discussing the issue</a> &gt;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://environmentaldeskbook.morganlewis.com/2011/03/follow-up-epa-postpones-greenhouse-gas-reporting-deadline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

